The Gospel of Jesus
The Gospel of Jesus
The whole book in PDF, here
Scientists, archaeologists and historians are asking whether Jesus existed or whether he is a myth. Christ didn't exist, Jesus did. But what does that mean? The Christ of the churches, of the Christian scriptures, did not exist.
The
Son of God, born of a virgin, by the operation of the Holy-Spirit, who
raised the dead, gave sight to the blind, multiplied the loaves, turned
water into wine, walked on water and, having died on the cross, rose
again, did not exist. Jesus did exist.
Historians
and archaeologists are looking for proof of his existence through
excavations, in search of new writings, of a napkin ring bearing his
name. The proof that Jesus existed is found in the teaching he gave for
three years, according to John, and for one year, according to the
Synoptics.
This
teaching is found in the Gospels, amid texts added to his word by the
church fathers. The "Gospel of Jesus" is the collection of his words,
without the miracles or the late moralizing additions.
Jesus was a man, more than a man: he was a buddha, an awakened.
Certain
controversial episodes have been preserved in this Gospel, such as
Jesus meeting with John the Baptist, his death on the cross and his
resurrection, among others.
Once Jesus' words have been stripped of the additions made by the church
fathers and other writers, we notice that his teachings closely
resemble those of the best-known Buddhas, such as the Indian Aryas
Gautama Siddhartha, the Chinese Lao-tzu and Patanjali.
Another
awakened, who delivered the same teachings, is the one whose name has
been forgotten and whom Hindus nicknamed "Krishna" or "The Black" after
plagiarizing and rewriting his words (an Upanishad), to integrate them
into the Mahâbhârata.
In
simple terms, this "Gospel of Jesus" respects the narrative of the four
canonical Gospels, with Jesus' words clarified and re-translated in
line with the history of the Greek and Aramaic languages. Miracles and
other "magic tricks", the fruit of the "Vita" narrative style, which
contribute nothing to the mysticism of Jesus, have not been retained.
If you liked this text, don’t forget to share on the networks
Commentaires
Enregistrer un commentaire